BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Microsoft Corporation//Outlook 12.0 MIMEDIR//EN
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-MS-OLK-FORCEINSPECTOROPEN:TRUE
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:GMT Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:16010101T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:16010101T010000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=3
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
CLASS:PUBLIC
CREATED:20091109T101015Z
DESCRIPTION:Speaker: Martino Trassinelli Institut des NanoSciences de Paris\n\nTopic: Bayesian data analysis tools for physics\n<p> <style type="text/css">p { margin-bottom: 0.25cm; direction: ltr; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); line-height: 120%; }p.western { font-family: "Cambria"; font-size: 12pt; }p.cjk { font-family: "Cambria"; font-size: 12pt; }p.ctl { font-family: "Times New Roman",serif; font-size: 12pt; } </style></p><p align="justify" class="western" lang="fr-FR" style="margin-bottom: 0cm; line-height: 100%"> <span lang="en-US">Classical statistical methods as the maximum likelihood and minimum chi-square methods, are widely and successfully implemented for data analysis of many and different experiments. However, they have some limitations due their basic assumptions. These methods are based on the probability maximization to obtain certain data values for a given set of model parameters. But what commonly is required is just the opposite; for given experimental data, one would like to obtain the probability for having certain parameter values. In general this does not cause major problems except in cases where prior information of the analysis parameter is important. For example, if the studied parameter is a mass, it has to be strictly positive, which cannot be correctly taken into account in the maximum likelihood method. Another problematic case occurs when we want to test different models for describing a same set of data. Classical approaches provide criterion methods to determine the more likely model but they cannot assign probabilities for each hypothesis. To overcome these and other difficulties, a different approach has to be implemented with a new and more general definition of probability. This approach is the result of the work of Th. Bayes (1783), P.-S. Laplace (19</span><sup><span lang="en-US">th</span></sup><span lang="en-US"> century), H. Jeffreys and of many others (20</span><sup><span lang="en-US">th</span></sup><span lang="en-US"> century) and is commonly called Bayesian statistics. Bayesian methods are routinely used in many fields: cosmology, particle physics, nuclear physics, etc. They are in fact particularly useful for rare phenomena where the use of standard probability, based on the principle of infinite experiment repeatability, is not justified. We present here an introduction to the concepts of Bayesian statistics with the application to simple examples.</span></p>
DTSTART;TZID=GMT Standard Time:20171215T12:30:00
DTEND;TZID=GMT Standard Time:20171215T13:30:00
TZID=GMT Standard Time
DTSTAMP:20100109T093305Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20091109T101015Z
LOCATION:Newman Red
PRIORITY:5
SEQUENCE:0
SUMMARY;LANGUAGE=en-gb:Bayesian data analysis tools for physics
TRANSP:OPAQUE
UID:040000008200E00074C5B7101A82E008000000008062306C6261CA01000000000000000
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-BUSYSTATUS:BUSY
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-IMPORTANCE:1
X-MICROSOFT-DISALLOW-COUNTER:FALSE
X-MS-OLK-ALLOWEXTERNCHECK:TRUE
X-MS-OLK-AUTOFILLLOCATION:FALSE
X-MS-OLK-CONFTYPE:0
BEGIN:VALARM
TRIGGER:-PT1440M
ACTION:DISPLAY
DESCRIPTION:Reminder
END:VALARM
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR